The death penalty has been a topic that has been much debated and discussed among Singaporeans, from teenagers to the elderly. In this essay, researchers attempt to understand why Singaporeans support the death penalty and what the numbers are. This research is a good way to test the words of the Singapore government, which has consistently stated that the majority of Singaporeans support the death penalty. We must therefore continue the practice of the death penalty. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Researchers say there is still an assumption that Singaporeans support the death penalty. The allegation was based on the Singapore Court of Appeal case of Chew Seow Leng v Attorney General (2005), in which the court found that Singaporean society displays a strong aversion to drug trafficking and that the defendant's lawyers failed to prove to the court that society's views on the death penalty had changed. The researchers then believe that if the lack of public support for the death penalty could be proven, changes could be made to the use of the death penalty in Singapore, such as its abolition. death sentence imposed by Singaporeans, researchers asked respondents whether the number of people executed over the past 10 years was high, average or low. More than 50% of respondents thought this figure was just nice. 8% believe that this figure is too low while the others consider it too high. It was also found that 7 out of 10 Singaporeans supported the death penalty. Understanding the reasons why there was majority support is essential for the abolition of the death penalty. Thus, two questions were asked to the respondents. The two questions were whether they would support the death penalty if (1) new scientific evidence proved that the death penalty was no more deterrent than life or very long imprisonment, and (2) s It was proven that innocent people had been executed. by an error in the court's judgment. Statistics indicate that 6 out of 10 people have always shown support while the rest have changed their support. The change in opinion was based on the idea that the death penalty is an effective deterrent, but that it was not justifiable to continue to use such a deterrent at the expense of innocent lives. . The study shows that public support for the death penalty can fluctuate. based on a variety of scenarios ranging from deterrence to wrongful conviction. This shows that Singaporeans are not well informed on the subject of the death penalty. Therefore, this research clearly proves that Singaporeans lack interest and knowledge on the subject of the death penalty. A major flaw I find in all research is that researchers treat opinions as facts. The truth is that a fact is a statement that can be confirmed as true or false by data or evidence. Whereas an opinion is a personal expression of feelings and thoughts that might not be established by data. Take, for example, some people who think that the world is not round, but rather flat. Although scientists refute this, these opinions are still relevant today. It is important to recognize the distinction between facts and opinions. Although everyone is entitled to an opinion, some of them do not have the same value. I do not agree with the researchers that.131.