The existence of God is a constant question that almost everyone seeks an answer to. At a time when the idea of ​​God was the center of everyone's conversation, philosophers/scientists began to discuss the existence of God and what he was like. With little knowledge and evidence to study whether God was real or not, people realized that after years and years, there simply wasn't enough to justify either side, it That's why you have to keep an open mind on topics like this. Our minds are still developing and there are such complex things that we hope to one day find a definitive answer for. There will be objections that discuss why other philosophers do not believe. in the idea of ​​a God. There are still people to this day who are theists, atheists and agnostics, but for now we are going to focus on the philosophers and their articles that prove the existence of God is legitimate and one of the greatest philosophers who will focus on this is holy. Thomas Aquinas and other like-minded philosophers. The existence of God is obviously the very first argument that arises, if we haven't yet found any evidence to support the existence of God, why do people still believe there is one? Bertrand Russell (1872-1970) was a famous philosopher who responded to this question by applying the burden of proof using the teapot analogy. To summarize, the teapot analogy is that there is a teapot somewhere in space that causes gravity. The teapot is “too small to see, too small to have its own gravity, older than the universe itself, is responsible for the existence of gravity” (Philosophical Content 5). When you apply this to the concept of the existence of God, it ends up being the exact same idea... middle of paper... thing that might not be there, which is what Pascal Wager is arguing against and talking about. the benefits of living life as if it existed versus if it didn't exist. Then, God's ability to not be able to deal with the existence of evil in the world is called into question, which is supported by the fact that he gives us free will and moral choice. Finally, they support the idea that everything has an exact cause and if that exact cause has not yet been identified, it is probably because it caused itself. This is opposed by the cosmological argument where everything comes down to God being this creator. God created the universe and everything in it for a reason. We rely on each other, we learn from our mistakes, we grow and progress in so many ways. Every person and thing created on this earth was placed there for a reason, so it is impossible that the universe could have simply created itself..