In "The Case against Banning the Word 'Retard,'" a law professor at Ohio State University's Moritz College of Law named Christopher M. Fairman writes to those under power of "word fetishism" are not satisfied until they stop using other people's words. In today's society, approximately 60,000 people have pledged support for banning the word retard, also known as the "R-Word" on a website called www.r-word.org, because they thought this use of words was “derogatory.” Fairman believes that we should not ban words for two reasons, the first being that banning words leads to government linguistic control that has institutionalized word taboos, and the second being that words themselves do not constitute the problem due to the evolution of meanings and uses. Fairman We also fear that banning any word could result in increased government linguistic control. In New Zealand, the Special Olympics had previously attacked the authority's broadcasting standards to ban the use of the word delay when broadcast to the public. This is important because the authority's broadcast standards are known to be quite similar to the Federal Communications Commission which regulates interstate and international communications such as radio, cable and television. Over time, the idea of ​​banning a certain word evolved and spread to the point of censorship in private organizations. For this reason, the idea of ​​banning or censoring words has already become widespread. During the 1980s and 1990s, many colleges and universities developed speech codes that were a set of rules not to do to reduce discrimination. The key idea that is conveyed here is that even the largest federal ministries, such as that of education, have already been in the middle of paper...... society has changed over time and the meaning of the word delay depends on where the word is used professionally or just in general. This idea is important because Fairman gives historical context on how the word delay was first used and reveals how the meanings of the words evolved. Last but not least, Fairman's suggestion about how the meanings and uses of a word change over time proves credible, so there is no point in "censoring" the word delay. In conclusion, Fairman concludes his article by saying that the Special Olympics "The plan to ban the word retard and protect intellectually disabled people from the use of this word will not succeed because new words will form to replace old ones words He also concludes by saying that the freedom of expression of words is very important and valuable, therefore, banning a word is not worth it..