A CIO of one of our large US clients sent me an email saying that I am now spending a lot of time looking for alternative sources in India. I don't think you want me to do this, and I don't want to do it. I immediately conveyed his message to the Indian Ambassador in Washington and told him to pass it on to the right person. (Friedman 174) United Technologies was the company that essentially called on an entire country to cease and desist from its state of near-nuclear war or else it would abandon its operations elsewhere. This concept of big corporations controlling such affairs on a large scale seems almost unreal, but in reality it is a big part of politics these days where corporations and the wealthy fund political campaigns in order to get their agenda out to the public . It seems that an underlying theme of analyzing theories and their effects on the world is essentially leading to some form of control of someone or something, whether it is controlling the client for them make believe that what he buys is a business or to control a nation. to avoid going to war to keep their income in their pockets or to avoid instability in a region that is still bad for business. Overall, war is a rather crushing defeat in the business world, if countries go to war rather than improve their status, get bounties and expand their market in war.