Throughout the world's existence, a few occasions have profoundly altered the political circumstances of human progress. One such occasion occurred in the second millennium BC. By this time, the Third Dynasty of Ur had controlled all of Mesopotamia for over a century. Climate change was one of the reasons and was particularly affected by its socialized and growing share. Besides climate, other circumstances such as social conditions, migrations and invasions transformed the politics, culture and economy of Southwest Asia, Mesopotamia, the main site of the Euphrates . After this period, the political situation was not generally good, but it got better in one way or another; the new rulers began to change the entire government system and spread the commercial culture, and were familiar with Sumerian culture. The Rulers, The most distinguished Mesopotamian ruler at this time was Hammurabi. He created a new legal order and, through his diplomatic and military skills, he became the most powerful king in Mesopotamia. To make his government more effective, he moved the capital to Babilon, which was the center of that period. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”?Get the original essayHammurabi was responsible for preparing his people for everything, including irrigation canals. In order to stabilize his state and organize its relations, he created the code of Hammurabi. It was written in the 18th century BC. The code consists of 282 edicts and concerns everything: marriage, punishments, treatment of crimes, etc. The codes themselves are written in the Akkadian language and are used in a beautiful cuneiform script as a writing system, and it was the first recorded law code. Hammurabi, describing the purpose of the code's prologue and epilogue, which describe Hammurabi's inherent position. At that time religion had a lot of intensity, and it was generally believed that the intensity of the lord came from the god; in this way, Shamash's outline makes Hammurabi's code and administration more and more real. The Code of Hammurabi is the essential source that will be considered in this article. Anyway, before moving on to discuss the essential source, I would perhaps like to say a few things regarding the political, social and monetary situation of Mesopotamia in the second millennium BC. As I mentioned previously, the situation in Mesopotamia was fundamentally shifted in light of environmental changes towards the end of the third millennium BC. The shepherds who took control of Mesopotamia took their particular societies with them and constructed a different type of city-state management. This new way of administering the city-state was the main basis for the subsequent creation of much larger regional states. Over the centuries, Mesopotamian rulers expanded their power and domains by crushing and weakening their neighbors. These nations had to pay a tribute composed of raw materials, extravagant things and products and labor. This work was then used to protect state domains, or to greatly expand them. Governors of regional states became lords, and later authority was inherited. Unlike Egypt, the government and strength of regional states in Mesopotamia rests primarily on the appeal of rulers – lords. This was on the grounds that the regional states did not have strong establishments. Therefore, the state's success was largely based onthe character of the lord. To talk about the economy in Mesopotamia, the financial movement also changed during this period; The city-states practically overtook the previous financial action and, in this sense, private space was not created. Regardless, during the second millennium BC, singular businessmen began to rise, and states in the region primarily focused on them and maintained their monetary movement. Mesopotamia was the crossroads of many courses of exchange, and as administration and therefore states became more stable in this region, trade began to expand and prosper. For the moment, individuals pay their contributions, but not in cash. They paid him with some type of vegetables and different goods. When it came to trade and other forms of commerce, Mesopotamia was the place that united many territories and thus maintained trade between them. These regions, for which Mesopotamia was a focal point of monetary development, were: southwest Iran, Egypt and Anatolia. They traded in ponies, wood, lapis lazuli and ivory. The social association converged with neighborhood social associations, creating a unique social structure. The association of the Amorites who were responsible for the rise of regional states in Mesopotamia was primarily ancestral. This implies that administration or administration depended largely on a single individual – a decision-maker. Mesopotamian rulers began to promote open crafts and build schools, some of which were for copyists, who were shown composing and editing in order to safeguard the ancient societies of Akkadian and Sumerian individuals. The general public at this time in Mesopotamia was also faction-based. I presented the political, economic and cultural situation of Mesopotamia; and it's time to talk about the source itself, the codes of Hammurabi. For example the third code "If a man, in a case (in progress, judgment), bears false testimony (threatening), or does not establish the testimony he gave, if this case is a matter involving life , this man will be put to death. ". This means that a third of the code addresses issues related to family and family ties, for example inheritance and separation. Only one arrangement appears to impose commitments on an administration official; this provision provides that a judge who changes his choice after its registration will be fined and permanently expelled from his seat. Some arrangements address problems identified with military aid. Code N139 said that "if there was no marriage contract, he will give her a mana of money for divorce." Which means if there was no marriage agreement, he would provide her with silver mana for a separation. Furthermore, the laws on marriage are very important here: “If a man takes a wife and does not enter into (proper) contracts with her, that woman is not a (legal) wife.” According to the laws of the code, the obligation of marriage falls largely on the woman. Typically, if a woman sells her half, she will be thrown out and taken to the waterway. Regardless, unlike women, men are not so carefully rebuffed if they agree to lie. According to the code, one can also learn about the inheritance of property in the Mesopotamian family. The father's house, after his death, was naturally given to his children. In any case, we realize that women also reserved the possibility of claiming ownership. In the event of the death of a wife who has children, a man should not promise..