-
Essay / Doubts about NASA's Moon landing
“The only way to find the limits of the possible is to go beyond them, into the impossible. » Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”? Get the original essay This famous quote from “2001: A Space Odyssey” inspired many young people of his generation to strive to achieve the impossible, like their childhood the heroes loved to travel to the celestial body closest to Earth. But that's exactly what many people think the moon landing was impossible: Fifty-one years after man first set foot on the moon, "moon landing conspiracy theorists" exist always. These skeptics who have very limited knowledge of physics and who have been lumped in with those who are also 911 truthers, anti-vaxxers, flat earthers, and holocaust deniers believe what they call “evidence” that can easily be refuted. What was impossible was that the astronauts would have died from radiation sickness before they even got to the Moon. The Van Allen belts are two radiation belts that protect Earth, but they contain dangerous amounts of radiation. NASA physicists working on the mission at the time explained that they had actually planned the mission so that at the exact moment they would pass the belts, they would be at their lowest intensity. Additionally, the crew and their rocket were well insulated, and ultimately only exposed to radiation similar to what a patient would receive during an x-ray. Some ridiculous theories claim that they couldn't have gone to the Moon because "the moon is made of light." Yes, some people actually believe that the Moon is a holographic image displayed in the sky by NASA. A more common theory is that, in an effort to win the space race, NASA faked the images of the moon landing. The images of the moon landing that 650 million people watched in awe, their eyes glued to their televisions, because they had never seen anything like it! The most realistic thing they had seen so far was the aforementioned film, released in theaters in 1968, a year before the footage was released. The film was famous for its scientific accuracy and won an Academy Award for visual effects, the footage of the moon landing and the film are not even comparable in quality. At the time, theories that the images were "fake" simply weren't valid; because everyone who saw the footage completely believed it. Why was the flag flying when there is no atmosphere on the Moon? Inside the top of the flag was a rod to hold the flag in place. When planted in the ground, the rectangular flag was disturbed, causing a ripple effect. It doesn't curl because in many different planes and times the ripples always stay in the same position. Why were there no stars in the background? First, the stars were there and the astronauts would have seen them, but the cameras did not capture them because the contrast between the sun shining on the moon's surface and the dark sky was too great for small points of light to be able to be seen. captured. This is confirmed by photographs of the Earth taken from the ISS. They have no stars in the background because the sun shining on the earth dims the starlight. Why are there shadows going in different directions if there is only one light source? The Moon has a very rough surface which causes shadow distortion,.