Many claim that Friedrich Nietzsche was a “far-sighted man who lost control of reality.” However, we already know that all philosophers have been subject to some form of criticism throughout their careers. Even Socrates was tried on two counts; with the corruption of youth and impiety. It seems that one cannot think for oneself and expand one's view of the universe without stirring up a little controversy. I think you can't truly know something without taking into account all ethical positions and perspectives. Because when we start to think about the “why” of the decisions we make, we are able to formulate more concrete resolutions to the situations we find ourselves in. I think it is important, as Nietzsche believed, unlike many philosophers in his work. Today, even some of the greatest philosophers of all time, Plato and Socrates. Nietzsche's first understanding of Socrates' life was the death of life. Socrates embodied reason, virtue and happiness, who believed in the vanity of life. He was known for wandering around, living in a state of poverty, and questioning the moral beliefs and ethical decisions of those around him. Nietzsche believes that Socrates and Plato were the "symptoms of the decline" of life, because life was a disease, and it progressed as reason revealed the disease spoken of by many. What then is the value of life? Nietzsche responds that this is a paradox: "For a philosopher to see a problem in the value of life is almost an objection to himself, a note of questioning against his wisdom - a lack of wisdom . That being said simply, Nietzsche encourages enjoyment of life and pleasure. Focusing more on the life we ​​are currently living, and not giving in to the illness that comes with it...... middle of paper ......if we are able to see it in others - or worse , at home. As I reflect on my own Christian beliefs and behavior, I see that Nietzsche challenges my morals and beliefs. First, the very fact that I am a Christian and believe in God is directly contradictory to his ideals. With this comes my desire to live a moral life and to model that life after that of Jesus Christ, as well as the belief in an afterlife. All of these things were previously discussed as being considered insane by the “Antichrist” and “immoralist.” He speaks with great irony about the belief in morality and the opinions of those who claim to know the purpose of this life. I believe his influence is still significant among those who choose to carefully examine and consider his work, as well as those who seek to better understand the purpose of religion and its role in our lives..