There are many things in life which are not concrete and which are constantly changing, while this leads to different points of view and ideas on these things. Everyone is different and expresses different opinions on things considered fixed. In Aphorism 124 (In the Horizon of the Infinite), Nietzsche attempts to convey this idea of ​​discovering different perspectives around one's surroundings, contrary to the general consensus that the world is seen as a fixed object/idea. Through Nietzsche's Aphorism 127, I will develop Nietzsche's idea of ​​fluidity, while comparing Nietzsche's view to some of Aristotle's views. First of all, Nietzsche imitates his ideas by elaborating with the use of figurative language, instead of using the literal meaning to emphasize the idea of ​​a different setting. For example, when considering art and poetry, each person interprets it differently through their own experiences or knowledge, and Nietzsche understands this and uses it to better illustrate his aphorism. Aristotle uses a more systematic approach to crafting his arguments, and is lacking in the "artistic" department. In Aphorism 124 (In the Horizon of the Infinite), Nietzsche uses symbolism to advance and present his picture of society's representation of the world. . This idea of ​​scorched earth is not meant literally, but metaphorically, with the idea in mind that people move forward without actually thinking that they are leaving things behind. It seems like people go through life without really being aware of it, almost as if they're going through the motions without really realizing where they are in the world. Nietzsche further states that "[the ocean] does not always roar, and sometimes it spreads like silk and gold and reveries of grace...... middle of a paper.. ....understand that this is a crucial part. to Nietzsche's own beliefs: arriving at our own conclusions and our own thinking, believing in what is real and understanding where we are in relation to the world. As I read this aphorism, I couldn't help but think about this idea of ​​authenticity in our moral views. We have based many of our moral ideas on things that were put forward and implemented before we could draw our own conclusions about an idea. Many people relay ideas and conceptions from what others think, we understand the world from what we are told; therefore, do the perspectives we have really come from the right mindset. As I mentioned previously, people have many interpretations of what something means, and I think people should continue to become more aware of their surroundings and formulate authentic experiences and ethical viewpoints from this..