blog




  • Essay / Analysis of Guy De Maupassant's Necklace through the feminist prism

    Table of contentsIntroductionFeminist analysis of The Necklace”ConclusionIntroductionAre men and women equal? Are we experiencing feminism these days? Is this important? Harri Holkeri, once a famous Finnish statesman, said that men and women have different roles but their rights are absolutely equal. As a member of Generation Z, I have seen so many awareness campaigns for gender equality, like the LGBTQ+ and Gabriela campaigns. Many people thought that feminist theory only attacked women's power and promoted women's superiority. In real life, he focuses on observing different perspectives in society and finding a way to shine a light on the endless inequalities and mistreatment of both genders – so he demands equality and a fair judgment. The aspect of the theory is to put an end to these social issues and problems towards women, on the other hand, irresponsible misidentification and such an overrated and dominant perspective from men in history. According to Jennifer Carlson and Raka Ray (2018), feminist theory addresses both the inequality of gender relations and the different structures of a man and a woman. Over time, everyone's point of view becomes fair and equitable for both sexes, which is something we should be proud of. Basically people thought that a woman was much weaker and had less rights and lower positions than a man in the earlier years of our deepest history, they thought that a woman was just a person who could control the affairs of the house. However, people today are becoming fair to both genders, the mentality of previous years has gone and changed that women are much better than people think and they can do everything that men can do. This just proves that they are more than just a housewife. Say no to plagiarism. Get a Custom Essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get an Original EssayFeminist Analysis of “The Necklace”The story of “The Necklace” highlights the power of men over all things and they have control over everything. the woman's decision. Drawing on feminist theory, it discusses the relationship between a man who has power over everything and a woman who only has the right to manage the events of the home. The author narrates Mathilde Loisel, the protagonist, as one of the pretty and charming girls in town. Mathilde is married to an employee and unhappy with what she has in her life. She confidently believes that she is a blessed woman with beautiful physical appearance, that is why she thought that she deserves nothing but all the luxury in the world. On the other hand, according to history, it is unfinished and not rich at all. In "The Necklace", she was described as being insubstantial and materialistic, just like what is said in the story: "She had no clothes, no jewelry, nothing. And those were the only things she loved; she felt she was made for them,” meaning she is too desperate for wealth. The lady in the story lives in a patriarchal society where women have fewer rights than men. It depicts the role of a woman in the public eye over the past hundred years: a housewife. The patriarchal society in which Mathilde grew up affects her attitude and personality. Because she is a woman living in a world where society focuses on male power, she has almost no control over her life. As history shows, Madame Loisel believed that wealth.