blog




  • Essay / The Presentation of Suffering in "Remains" and "War Photographer"

    Within Remains, Simon Armitage, widely known for focusing on physiological health and for creating a documentary about a young soldier at the height of conflict in Afghanistan, presents the theme of suffering through the personal perspective of a young regimented soldier, sharing a scene that had clearly left a deep sense of guilt and caused physiological health problems such as stress syndrome post-traumatic. It's because he, "and someone else and someone else", shot a man who was robbing a bank, but he was "maybe armed, maybe not", that which sparked uncertainty in the soldier's mind, filling him with guilt as best he could. shot an innocent man. In comparison, Carol Ann Duffy, social critic and Poet Laureate, expressed suffering by focusing on the memories and flashbacks a photographer experienced while developing "in his darkroom" the photos he taken during the wars. The war photographer is clearly making an experienced attempt to detach himself from the "hundred agonies in black and white" so that he can concentrate on the work at hand as a desperate coping mechanism, but a certain memory forces its way to the foreground of his mind. mind by remembering “the cries of this man’s wife” and reconnects with a very important moment for the woman: the death of her husband. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why violent video games should not be banned"? Get the original essay Symbolism is used by Simon Armitage in Remains to describe how "that looter" haunted the soldier's memory and appeared everywhere, thus ensuring that the young soldier would not even be able to pass through "the bank doors" without entering a vivid flashback. The soldier's memories of the bank seem to represent an overflowing river bank, where the current of his memories is too strong to be compressed into view of the bank which he regularly visits for his own use, for his immense war experiences have so marked his mind. so anything that even remotely resembles his regimented past will bring back the flooded memories. The former soldier appears to be suffering from PTSD after a horrific incident that left him questioning whether he murdered an innocent man with "someone else and someone else," or whether the soldiers had reason and killed someone who was potentially about to harm him. a lot of people. Repetition is also used earlier in the poem to describe the fact that there is no escaping the self-condemnation that the looter was "probably armed, maybe not." Because the soldier can't even sleep without this man's nightmares, it leads him to turn to self-medicating with "drink and [drugs]" and even that still doesn't "flush him out." The mere fact that he consumes “drinks and drugs” shows that this man is no longer in the army. Whether he left willingly or not, soldiers would have been routinely examined for these things, even if they weren't. tested for mental health issues and therefore received no help on this item. The alliteration used further indicates a lack of support he received because he should have spoken to a therapist about his mental health issues, despite 0.4% of military money being spent on mental health soldiers, making it unlikely that his illness would be noticed. The way the soldier describes the "[looter]" as alive indicates that he lives in his memory. Furthermore, the metaphor used by Armitage to describe how the dead man appears everywhere without exception conveys the idea that theBoth the looter and the speaker were victims, although for different reasons. Because the man is "in [the soldier's] mind when [he closes his eyes]", it makes mental health issues seem almost something inevitable. Colloquial language is also used by the soldier to describe how the soldier felt towards the shooting, feeling as if the victim's "bloody life" had ended because of his "bloody hands". The adjective "bloody" used to describe the dead man's life implies that the young man felt solely responsible for having "torn [the looter's] life apart" and for killing him. The grief he feels is reflected in his mental health issues, another of which could be OCD. The soldier could literally imagine the man's blood on his hands again and having made his own hands bloody because he had washed them so much that he had torn the skin. A living scar is something his mental illnesses might be considered, almost as if the fact that he killed that man was etched into his skin. The grief coursing through the soldier's body forces him to constantly question whether he is a murderer, which might explain why the repetition of the adjective "bloody" is used. The idea of ​​monotony and repetition provokes thoughts that make the speaker relive the event “again” and “again” and “again.” This adverb indicates that there is no escape from thoughts and by simply calling the dead man a "looter", it implies that the soldier's thoughts cannot be assuaged because this man is identified and anonymous, it is i.e. he can't visit her grave or apologize, which only brings out more regret. The dead man was "left for dead in a distant land, smothered by the sun, smothered by sand, or six feet underground in the sand of the desert", which offered no peace to the speaker as he could not even not sure if the man he had killed had even had a proper burial. The hissing creates an effect that draws attention to the quote, implying ideas of discontent and non-closure, meaning that the dead man will forever haunt his mind and cause him health problems because he does not cannot be “rinsed”. contrasts with the "half-formed ghost" who "[begins] to writhe" before the subject's eyes in Carol Ann Duffy's War Photographer, for even though the metaphor contains no details of the "stranger's features" ( conveying ideas of anonymity and death that resembles the hundreds of others that the photographer has witnessed), the permanent stain of life that remains of the "blood stained in foreign dust" allows the photographer to revisit the deathbed of the 'innocent if he searched hard enough and wanted it. However, although the photographer was able to visit the location of this event, he moved away because it happened elsewhere, even though the memories were things he could not leave abroad, as well as the mental marks of war. The metaphor also implies that the innocent man's blood literally soaked into the ruined ground like an immovable tattoo of life. Duffy also uses whistling, symbolism, and juxtaposition to describe how the reels of photographs turn into "reels of suffering [are] posed." arranged in orderly rows. The rows suggest a clear military connection, representing the "orderly ranks" to which soldiers would report in the army, which is symbolic as it serves as a form of order in the fields of chaos. A cemetery could also be interpreted as "orderly rows", symbolizing the enormous loss of life and happiness that occurs throughout the war. The sibilant expression.