-
Essay / Criticism and symbolism in The Trial of Franz Kafka
Maryam M. ElhabashyMrs. Valerie WatsonEnglish 9 GTApril 11, 2014Research PaperThe Trial of Kafka is recognized as both a psychological thriller and one of the most complex religious allusions ever published. Published in 1925, The Trial is classified as both absurdist and psychological fiction. The dominant theme of The Trial involves the obvious struggle one encounters in establishing one's innocence. The Trial of Franz Kafka is not autobiographical; and understands the literary elements of symbolism, characterization, and themes; and received extensive and in-depth reviews. The Trial is a parable written in the third person (limited omniscient) depicting the trials of a man trying to establish his innocence for a crime he did not commit. The entire book revolves around a main character, Josef K., a young, ambitious and reputable banker who is arrested without having committed a crime. The story begins with his arrest. He is outraged and defiant of everything the officers and inspector tell him. The following year, Josef K. did everything in his power to win the surrealist case against him. The court remains impassive and indifferent to K.'s testimony, and his friends abandon him. The narrator captures K.'s paralyzing disregard for the unjustifiable and senseless battles waged against him by the court, the law, and society. He is ultimately overcome by his own doubt in trying to establish his innocence within the framework of a law which he admits to his captors whom he does not know. The novel is less about the struggle between K. and his wrongful captors than about the struggle between K. and himself. In the end, he gives up the battle and is stabbed to death the night before his thirty-first birthday (Kafka 1...... middle of paper...... (Muir) "However, there is no such thing as as a perfect writer If there were a perfect book, no criticism would have been leveled against it. The Trial, like all other works of human literature, has flaws, many of which have also been analyzed by many. many readers while critics ridicule Kafka for his limits on what the reader knows, Tabitha McIntoch-Byrd explained in an essay that the reader is plunged into a confusing world from the first sentence of The Trial. can answer is still confirmed, and that this vague and open style of writing makes The Trial too vague in all its aspects (McIntosh-Byrd It is not only the critics whose opinions have been challenged, the philosophers who see in). The Trial, a new area of ​​philosophy has also been contradicted.