Although migration is not a prerequisite for human trafficking, human trafficking involves the movement of people across national and international borders. In this case, human trafficking can be seen as a segment of broader human migration. There are various theoretical approaches that have been developed to explain the factors that cause people to migrate. Theories in this category strive to answer the question of why migrations begin. Among others, neoclassical economics or rational choice theory is probably the oldest and best known theory of migration. According to Douglas and his colleagues, there are two models of neoclassical economics, the macroeconomic and microeconomic models. Because it focuses on individuals' decision and choice to migrate, the latter model is used in this research. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”?Get the original essayRational choice theory or the micromodel of neoclassical economics can be used to explain human trafficking from the point of view economic and social. This theory explains human behavior and the choices people make. In general, according to Douglas et al (1993), the fundamental argument behind this theory is that individuals, as rational beings, wish to maximize economic and social gains and minimize risks. The rational choice theory framework can help explain human trafficking from the perspectives of trafficking victims and traffickers. According to this theory, people decide to migrate because a cost-benefit calculation leads them to expect a positive net return, usually monetary, to movement. Migration is conceptualized as a form of investment in human capital. People choose to move to a place where they can be most productive, given their skills; but before they can enjoy the higher wages associated with greater labor productivity, they must undertake certain investments, which include the material costs of travel, the effort required to learn a new environment and culture, the difficulty experienced in s adapting to a new job market and the psychological costs of breaking old ties and establishing new ones. Trafficking victims initially make the decision to trust traffickers in the hope that they will accumulate money and have a better lifestyle in another country. In this case, according to rational choice theory, the trafficking victims were initially rational because they decided to move with the traffickers to another country where they hope for a better lifestyle. Because traffickers have professional knowledge of deceptive talents, they are extremely persuasive and can easily persuade individuals to migrate. When it comes to the golden deals promised by traffickers, the risk of trusting a trafficker seems low compared to the huge future rewards. Just like the decision of trafficking victims, the decision made by traffickers is also rational. To gain the trust of individual victims and generate a huge amount of money from their trafficking, traffickers deceive and persuade individuals with false promises. In this theory, rational decision making, free will, and cost-benefit analysis are the three main variables. which was used to construct an integrated framework to explain human trafficking. How human traffickers.