Traditionally, cluster ability or intelligence has been examined in groups as a combination of associated degrees of psychological abilities or skills of each member. However, various studies and meta-analyses have undoubtedly shown that the correlation between average intelligence and team performance is quite weak, especially on the field. This may apparently be due to the loss of knowledge resulting from crossing the research levels. To reinforce this point, researchers recently investigated whether or not intelligence exists at the cluster level, taking an approach identical to that used by psychologists for over a century to examine the intelligence of individuals. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essayIn the field of mensural intelligence for people, psychologists have repeatedly shown that a statistical factor emerges from correlations between individuals' performance on a wide range of psychological tasks. . This problem is commonly referred to as “g” or “general intelligence”. “General intelligence is conceptualized as an individual's ability to perform a wide range of tasks. A recent analysis examined whether or not there is an analogous “collective intelligence” for teams of individuals. The researchers assigned around two hundred teams to a wide range of different types of tasks and found that groups that performed well in one type of task under consideration also performed best in all other tasks. A basic analysis of the groups' scores revealed a single, dominant, and general problem explaining an inordinate proportion of the variance in the total groups' scores, consistent with the amount of variance usually explained by the main electric battery of individual psychological characteristic tasks. They called this first issue “collective intelligence”. “It was then demonstrated that collective intelligence makes it possible to predict the future performance of a team on a large number of complex tasks. Functionally, many groups are made up of individuals who have completely different information, knowledge, and experiences and must share and integrate them. Collaboration is the art and science of sharing and misusing information. Cooperative resolution of disadvantages requires groups to generate new information and create inferences that no individual member of the cluster could have deduced. In this regard, 3 forms of inferences can be distinguished: Individual (generated by a member of the team), shared (generated by the cluster, which all has the information) and cooperative (new information which will be deduced from the information of the individual members). Teams are better prepared to generate inferences from shared information, followed by individual information, but are less adept at generating collaborative inferences. One strategy for improving the level of information aggregated during cooperative problem solving is to allow individual cluster members time to recall and internally record the details of the expertise or private observation that will be shared more late with the cluster as a whole. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. .Get a custom paper now from our expert writers.Get a custom essayAnother strategy that improves cooperative problem solving is following a scripted method of gathering and sharing knowledge. This structured script or program..