blog




  • Essay / The pros and cons of corporate responsibility - 707

    DUNCAN, P, 2000, “Corporate Responsibility – A Shell View”, The Sydney Papers, “autumn 2000. 2. FERGUSON, A, 2006, Corporates See the Light, Business Review Weekly, June 29, 2006. 3. MANN, S, 2003, Economics, Business Ethics and Law, Sydney, Lawbook Co, p 87. 4. REDMOND, L, 2005/06, The Challenge of CSR, Reform, number 87. , p. 22-26. 5. REDMOND, P, 2005/06, Corporate social responsibility, reform, number 87, pp 7-11. 6. ROBBINS et al, 2006, Foundations of Management second ed., Sydney, Pearson Education Australia. 7. SCHEMERHORN et al, 2004, Management; an Asia-Pacific Perspective, Milton QLD, John Wiley & Sons Inc. 8. STANDEN, M, 2005/06, The Corporation in Society, Reform, issue 87, pp 12-16. 9. WILSON, T, 2005, The Pursuit of Profit no matter what, Alternative Law Journal, December 6, 2005, pp 278-282 (emphasis included). 10. WORLD VISION AUSTRALIA, 2006, Asia Tsunami Disaster – World Vision Response, http://www.worldvision.com.au/offers/tidal wave/index.asp, [08/19/2006] Indeces Index 1: Levels of Social responsibility. Social commitment is a company's commitment to respect its financial and legal obligations. Social responsiveness, again, alludes to the limit of a company in adapting to societal evolution.