-
Essay / Reasons why governments should spend money on public transport
The Internet has recently become more accessible and of higher quality to citizens, mainly for commercial purposes. So there is no need so far to prioritize improving the Internet. On the other hand, most public transportation is still lacking in large parts of the world. Lack of transportation can cause societal problems in multiple ways. It is clear to me that it is more important and more urgent for governments to take steps to improve public transport than to improve internet access. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”?Get the original essayFirst of all, when the government spends money on public transport, it can reduce the proportion of polluted air and leave more parking spaces. The more private cars there are, the more parking spaces are needed. For example, when I lived in Thailand years ago, there was a policy for the election of what is called the first car. This policy has gradually affected the country towards more toxic pollution. This turned out to be a big failure. The traffic is too heavy. Although large-scale transportation can sometimes pollute the air, switching from private cars to public transportation can significantly reduce toxic pollution and allow for more parking spaces. For this reason, I am not convinced to consider that the government should rather encourage the population to buy a new first car, but rather that it should provide more budget for the extension of public transport. Another inevitable reason is that financially supporting society in the field of transportation can permanently reduce the number of accidents. When the car owner drives himself, he is more likely to have accidents. Indeed, for example, the decisions of each car owner are more complex on the road than those of public transport drivers. If the government allows high parking and parking fees for car ownership, this would discourage individuals from purchasing their own private car. Although public transportation disaster alone could harm people's lives more broadly, common accident statistics were reported more frequently by individuals. The Internet has recently become more accessible and of better quality to citizens, mainly for professional purposes. So there is no need so far to prioritize improving the Internet. On the other hand, most public transportation is still lacking in large parts of the world. Lack of transportation can cause societal problems in multiple ways. It is clear to me that it is more important and more urgent for governments to take steps to improve public transport than to improve internet access. Firstly, when the government spends money on public transport, it can reduce the proportion of polluted air and leave more parking spaces. The more private cars there are, the more parking spaces are needed. For example, when I lived in Thailand years ago, there was a policy for the election of what is called the first car. This policy has gradually affected the country towards more toxic pollution. This turned out to be a big failure. The traffic is too heavy. Although large-scale transportation can sometimes pollute the air, switching from private cars to public transportation can significantly reduce toxic pollution and).