This raises questions regarding the candidacy of those appointed to sit on the bench, as these individuals could support the interests of the government of the day. For example, they can use the abilities granted to them by the Charter to change laws in order to advance the government's agenda (Riddell, Hausegger, and Hennigar 69). Furthermore, such appointments suggest that individuals working in the justice system may be less qualified than those who were unable to benefit from such selection due to their nonpartisan position. This could affect service delivery, as competence is a crucial element of justice service. Similarly, the tendency of some appointed judges in the judiciary to donate funds to political parties will undermine the independence of the courts, leading them to serve political interests even in cases of important public interest (Riddell, Hausegger, and Hennigar 55 ). Therefore, the issue of cronyism remains a crucial challenge for the next decade. The reason could be that the commissions or committees responsible for solving this problem are not detached from any political influence. Mr. Hassan, an engineer and former chair of the Ontario Advisory Council on Multiculturalism and Citizenship, said that “potential candidates from Indigenous communities or visible minorities are discouraged