As always, my essays generally turn out to be dry and monotonous, but undeniably rich in informative meat and teeth. My comments could be described as repetitive for some, boring for some, but exhaustive for most. I always use long, winding descriptions for the simplest thing, usually stringing together a series of dependent thoughts at a melodramatic pace. Long, unevenly formed sentences in a series of dependent clauses that ultimately culminate in the basic idea at the end of the sentence become a signature of my literary style. The three most notable literary elements of syntax in my previous essay are the use of periodic, complex, and long sentences which contribute to my typically crystalline writing style. Perhaps the most significant element of my writing style is the dominant use of periodic phrases littered with periodic phrases. throughout my essay. I generally intended the periodic sentence to gradually develop the idea contained in the sentence so that the idea could be fully understood and appreciated. When writing the essay, I was afraid that my ideas would naturally be misinterpreted, which led me to use the periodic sentence format. This allows unintended syntactic devices, like my procatalepsis employed in my first body paragraph that I used regarding objections to "Pharisee justice", to be used without disrupting the logical cause-and-effect flow of my main point. that I wanted to convey in the sentence. In a particular case in the sentence in my second paragraph, "because of the death of Christ" is clearly the cause in my logical flow that leads to my singular expression of my "privilege to live a holy life with God." Likewise, the third body paragraph states that "because I am signing... in the middle of the article... the syntactic use of periodic, complex, and long sentences which have contributed to my style in my essay had the effect of depicting an organized, deliberate, and systematic flow toward my essay in exchange for a bland, suffocating atmosphere of excessive clarifications and ideals. I admit that I had no idea of ​​the definition of syntax before applying my fingers to the keyboard for this essay, which obviously displays a series of distasteful writings that can only generously be classified as something of slightly higher than a chemistry laboratory report. Regardless, the wide range of descriptions, whether boring or not, ultimately contributes to my sincerity in this essay: what kind of person would be so meticulous in their descriptions for something that carried no weight for his heart? My sentences are undeniably simple and unremarkable, but they ring of hard work, deliberation and heart..