The Jack Roller by Clifford R. Shaw is a first individual perspective on the life of a young survivor on the roads of Chicago, Illinois. Stanley, the hero of the story, recounts live his childhood in a difficult home and how he made a living going from the roads to the remedial offices. Stanley's story begins when he was 16 years old. In any case, he makes some references to life as a young man of 7, 10 and even 5 years old. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay The underlying element of Stanley's misconduct is the discipline and mistreatment of his mother-in-law. Stanley had developed a colossal contempt for his mother-in-law, so isolated that we never take his mother-in-law's name. He describes her contempt several times, saying: “I developed a disdain for her that still endures; a contempt that burned to the point that when she examined my eyes, she read it there, and in this way, she knew my inclination. " Although Stanley despised his mother-in-law, she was one of the main influencers of his criminal action. Stanley depicts his first experience of consoling his mother-in-law in the face of wrongdoing. "One day, my mother-in-law advised William to take me to the rail yard to rob rail cars” After many successful thefts, the mother-in-law began to view their wrongdoing as compensation Stanley said the goals behind her demanded a raise. of consumption: "My consumption turned out to be extremely productive for her, so why not make it much more profitable? Theft was particularly common in her neighborhood and it was not unusual for these manifestations to be confirmed by the guards?" These announcements identify directly with the social learning hypothesis and more particularly with Edwin Sutherland's theory of differential associations. The main criminal conduct is discovered. Stanley has been shown to commit violations and wrongdoing by others. The most imperative part of learning criminal conduct is the ethical code behind it. Considering the consolation of his mother-in-law, he is informed that the wrongdoings are satisfactory and supported by his general public. The second and third part of this hypothesis is that conduct is discovered through intimate correspondence. Stanley now lives with his mother-in-law and is immersed in an area that favors criminal movements. Suggestions 4 and 5 view legal codes as being linked to mindsets of wrongdoing. Stanley is shown states of mind contrary to the permission of the law and transmits these behaviors throughout his life. Recommendation 6 addresses the differential affiliation component. This is when a person's misbehavior is more ideal than no wrongdoing. The activities of a criminal receive a greater amount of compensation and approval than those of an honest resident. This angle is particularly evident in his communications with his mother-in-law. Stanley is compensated while he pursues criminal proceedings. Therefore, misbehavior is more ideal for Stanley as a boy than resisting his stepmother who inflicts physical abuse on him. Propositions 7 and 8 speak of the fluctuation of various people in their own circumstances. Recommendation 9 confirms that criminal conduct is a statement of necessities and qualities. Anyway, oneNon-criminal behavior can also be a statement of necessities and qualities. As a young person, Stanley needs the approval and support of a parent, guardian, or a good role model. Stanley gains this approval while submitting offenses that impress and arouse the pride of Stanley's mother-in-law. This need is satisfied after remuneration, or for Stanley's situation, by lack of discipline. In Sutherlands' book, Principles of Criminology, he also clarifies the requirement for young men to be "unpleasant and extreme", revealing their manhood in front of their friends. Stanley needs recognition, especially since this recognition is not obtained at home. More and more young men were looking towards the more established offenders. Stanley describes this marvel: "The little colleagues enjoyed the 'hotshots' and looked forward to the day when they could get involved in the huge racket." » Stanley had just talked about catching as a method of survival. Every time he was pushed back due to his activities, he didn't feel like a criminal, but destiny had chosen this type of activities for him. It was at this point that he began to lose the respect of the world. According to him, he is trying hard to survive, while the world considers him a criminal. Stanley says: “There is no fairness on the planet. The most horrific offenders are never caught. » From the beginning, Stanley was indemnified for criminal conduct and held for the absence of criminal conduct. The social learning hypothesis is social. Link theory created by Travis Hirschi. Keeping in mind the end goal of creating a successful social bond, four prerequisites must be met. The main one, association, is the contribution to non-wrongdoing exercises. We see early on that Stanley has no interest in school, let alone extra exercise. The next prerequisite is connection. Stanley's primary relative becomes his stepmother. Despite the fact that he is continually with his mother-in-law, he never establishes a passionate relationship. Hirschi says: “If a man does not think about the wants and desires of other individuals – that is, if he is obtuse to the feelings of others – at that point he is not bound by norms. It's allowed to go wrong. " Stanley is allowed to deviate from the norms since he is not tied to them in any way. He is not stressed about frustrating anyone, since he has no one to disappoint. The next two are the responsibility and conviction. Stanley focuses on his qualities, but his qualities depend on reprobate behavior. Since his progressive mother energized reprobate behavior, this has become his set of central qualities. Stanley is convinced that these manifestations are not. not fair, but as a teenager, one's connections and beliefs with parental figures have a far greater impact than the laws of society. As Hirschi points out, guardians are the most critical part. Nor is he interested in institutional exercises While Hirschi clarifies responsibilities, he says: "When or at any time he thinks about degenerate conduct, he should think about the costs of this abnormal conduct, the risk he continues to run. to lose the speculations he made in his normal conduct. » Stanley showed no interest in teaching or a work environment. So this creates the mindset: “I have nothing to lose”. It was only after various imprisonments and disciplinary activities within the framework of criminal justice that he understood that these activities were not recognized by society. It wasn't until he was retained in an office called "Pontiac" that he rethought his outlook from another angle. He said: “ »..