blog




  • Essay / Forced Blood Donation in the United States: Necessity or Bad Idea

    In the United States, we have the right to make our own choices about what happens to our bodies. Making decisions, giving consent or refusing, is up to the person alone. As American citizens, we have this power and the right to do so in all circumstances. Even with medical treatments, we have the right to refuse any treatment or care. There are many reasons why a person may not want to receive treatments or procedures, whether invasive or not. “Consenting to treatment means that a person must give permission before receiving any type of medical treatment, test or examination. » Consent is required before proceeding with any medical treatment or procedure, as the patient must be informed of the procedure or treatment, its benefits, risks and possible outcomes. The blood donation procedure is no different. Forcing someone to donate blood is not a good idea because it goes against some people's religious beliefs, contradicts the law that forcing someone to draw blood is considered assault, and carries certain risks for health in the event of a blood test. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay Many people refuse to have blood drawn because of their religious beliefs. There are many religions that do not allow blood to be taken. Examples of religions that prohibit medical treatment include Christian Scientists, Jehovah's Witnesses, Scientologists, and the Amish. These religious people believe in healing their faith and spirituality. “Fundamentalists tell us that their lives are in God's hands and that we, as doctors, are not God” (Frankel). Everyone's religious beliefs must be respected, as ridiculous as it may seem. Especially in a country that promotes the right to practice religious beliefs like the United States. Compulsory donation for all would not work in the interest of these people. This would deprive them of their fundamental rights as citizens of this country. They believe in the healing power of prayer alone and this must be respected. When trying to morally solve something like increased blood donations, it can completely create new problems for many. Dr. Sloan, professor of psychology, says, “Too often, deference to religion in contemporary American society has led us to subordinate all other values. » Drawing someone's blood forcefully contradicts our laws. Unless a blood test is justified in a crime, it is prohibited. The phlebotomist or person drawing blood must obtain consent from the patient. If consent is withdrawn at any time or not even obtained from patients, the procedure or treatment should not proceed further; If they are then restrained and forced to have blood drawn during a routine blood test, this is considered a form of assault and battery. Forcing anyone to donate violates their constitutional rights. Proceeding with the donation without consent then violates the Fourteenth Amendment; “guarantee a broad range of rights against violation by states, including those listed in the Bill of Rights (freedom of speech, free exercise of religion, right to bear arms, etc.) as well as the right to life privacy and other fundamental rights. rights not mentioned elsewhere in the constitution. This goes against the fundamental rules of consent. It's even in thethe very name of “donating” blood. To donate is to voluntarily give something. Especially today, we live in a world where people are taking back their deserved rights over their own bodies. Many people take a stand in many situations involving the right to make choices about their own bodies. These situations include abortion, vaccines, consent, etc. Forcing someone to donate blood also contradicts people's right to make their own choices in all these situations. How are people supposed to fight for their own body's choices and have people been held down to insert a needle into their arm and draw their blood? Should organ donation and compulsory vaccination also be legal and justified? This is a contradiction with everything known today. When training a phlebotomist, they are taught that restraining/forcing a patient in any way is not acceptable. Even if a doctor ordered to restrict/force a patient to have blood drawn, his or her demands should not be met. Holding a patient back can cause anxiety in the patient and make the situation worse quite quickly. This can lead to the phlebotomy technician injuring them as well. It is completely dangerous and illegal to impose a donation on anyone against their free will. Another reason a person may refuse to donate blood is some of the health risks that may arise. Not only is having blood drawn uncomfortable, but it is also a process that can take up to an hour and fifteen minutes. This can cause redness, bleeding, and swelling around the site. A person may even feel weak or dizzy after donating. Although these symptoms usually disappear within three days, the patient should still take them into account. The health of patients should in no way be taken lightly as any of the listed symptoms have an effect on them and they must choose whether to pursue them or not. There are many reasons to go out and donate blood. The good thing is that I can save lives. The only way to do this is to rely on people's donations. Although it can save a life, the reality is that not all blood donations are used. So even if someone has taken the time to make an effort to donate blood, the donation still has to go through rigorous testing and may end up being rejected. Once a donation has occurred, the person who donated really doesn't know where their blood is going. Not only that it may not be used or even be used to save a life if this constitutes a valid reason. Because organ donation can save a life. Does this mean that everyone should be forced to donate their organs to those who need them? According to AHIP, “In the United States alone, approximately 42,000 of the 4.1 million children born each year die prematurely from vaccine-preventable diseases.” Does this mean we should also allow vaccines to become mandatory or should we allow people to be able to weigh the pros and cons to decide what is best for themselves? Compulsory blood donation will only lead to chaos by being inconsistent with many medical procedures and treatments offered as options today. According to a survey conducted by Carter Blood Care, the third main reason why people should donate blood is because it is their civic commitment. duty or responsibility of every citizen. Although this may be a form of civic duty, it does not mean that you simply have to perform this particular act. Someone could demonstrate and express their civic duty by performing and.