-
Essay / Reason why elections are less democratic - 548
Reason why elections are less democraticThe reason why elections are less democratic is because some people say that money takes away our well-known democracy, but in many cases other cases, we have the largest democracy compared to other countries of our vast magnitude. Throughout the 19th century, campaigns were party-led and party-oriented. Instead of voting for a person, you vote for an individual party, either Federalist or Democratic-Republican. Today, in the 20th century, we vote for the candidate and their true personality or what they have to offer us. These days, to run a successful campaign you need money, a good pollster, a well-organized debate, direct mail, and positive publicity. “Money is the mother's milk of politics”, if you don't have it, you won't have it. go anywhere. Campaign money comes partly from the federal government and partly from private donors in a presidential election, but congressional elections are all financed by private donors. Most of the money for a congressional leader comes from individual donors, but he also has political action committees (interest groups) that raise money for his campaign. Presidential candidates also raise money from individual donors because the federal government will match them dollar for dollar. The reform was successful in the sense that it minimizes the fact that a fat cat buys its own pet politician, but it also takes away from parties, gives advantage to wealthy challengers, gives advantages to candidates with strong ideological appeal, penalizes those who start late in the campaign, and help incumbents and harm their challengers. The Democratic Party has more registered voters, so logically the Democrats should win. The reason they don't always win is that those who are Democrats are not as strongly committed to their party as Republicans are, Republicans also do better with independent voters, and more Republicans get out and vote than Democrats. what we call critical elections. This happens when a major party suffers such a defeat (due to a major issue that arises and divides the party) that it disappears or there is a shift of voters between the major parties. There were three major realignment elections: 1860, 1896, and 1932. In 1860 it was the issue of slavery, in 1896 it was economic issues, and in 1932 it was the economic depression. Some say we're preparing for one because of the effects of the New Deal, but others say it won't happen again because party labels have lost their meaning. For a given party to win an election, it must retain its old voters. , but