Differences Between Personal Ethics and Professional EthicsEthics is a word that can be used generally, so it is important to understand the meaning of this question by examining the meaning of personal ethics. or professional ethics. To understand what personal ethics is, we may need to mention words such as honesty, integrity or responsibility, which are also considered part of an individual's codes of conduct. These individual qualities are informed in us from our childhood. Furthermore, an individual's origin and social life play an important role in the formation of these values. For example, when a child is taught honesty by his father from a young age, he learns, retains and values ​​this quality. As the child grows, this influences their actions and behavior. This quality will also manifest itself in different contexts such as during communications with family, friends or in business, such values ​​will naturally shine through in their behavior. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an Original EssayOn the contrary, professional ethics can be thought of as codes of conduct established by a committee of an organization. Professional ethics are different from personal ethics because the individual has a choice between what is right and what is wrong. But when it comes to professional ethics, the individual has no choice. It is more important for organizations to increase their reputation. For example, it is necessary to ensure that each individual in the organization performs their job as they should. Professional codes of ethics ensure that the individual is responsible for their actions. It also implies a sense of responsibility. So there are some differences between personal ethics and professional ethics. First, as I noted a little above, the individual can make a decision with their values ​​or qualities such as responsibility and honesty in personal ethics. However, the same is not true when it comes to professional ethics. For example, as a professional you have a particular right thing, so you have to choose the one that is always considered right. Furthermore, personal ethics has a sense of right or wrong that can be changed, but the law of professional ethics is already stated by the industrial context and cannot be changed. Therefore, these two things sometimes come into conflict due to the fact that when they see a solution from different angles. For example, in a real story that happened in 1971 and known as the "Stanford Prison Experiment", they did an experiment on students with $15 a day to act like prisoners and guards. From the first day, the student guards, who hold all the power, acted seriously towards the student prisoners. Also, the result of this experiment started from the first day of the night by student prisoners writing a letter and on the title one of them wrote his prison number, not a name. During the experiment, the guards were really harsh and harsh to the student prisoners, so the student prisoners tried to escape or even didn't want to take their money and wanted to cancel the experiment. But the experiment manager didn't want them to get off easy. But it went really bad, for example, the guards used their power to mistreat the prisoners and act with them like real prisoners. Moreover, the continuation period of this experiment was 1 to 2weeks, but this experiment was canceled after only 6 days due to a bad situation. After this happened, a student guard said in an interview, "When you have little or no supervision over what you're doing and no one steps up and says, 'Hey, you can't do that”, things continue. escalation. You think, how can we top what we did yesterday? How can we do something even more outrageous? (Dave Eshelman, 1971). He also said he regretted what he did during an experiment. So according to In this case, professional ethics becomes more powerful than personal ethics, personal ethics becoming like professional ethics without realizing the recent situation. Once one is too lacking in professional ethics or in ethical blindness, it is difficult to maintain or maintain one's personal ethics in one's profession. Second, but on the other hand, there was a student guard who only lost his personal ethics like morality at the end of the experiment. Until now, you may think that it is always good to keep personal ethics in our life, but what if you were nice to prisoners? Will the student prisoners be as they are or will they be more out of control. Therefore, you must also understand that personal ethics is responsible for the individual. However, professional ethics is not only about the individual, but also about the organization. For example, as we discussed in class, the CFO Dilemma (Henn, 2009) where a CFO firm had knowledge of a financial problem it was facing. He had to choose between personal ethics and professional ethics. In terms of personal ethics, he wanted more money because he was having a baby and he wanted to get a new car. If this comes true, it may be considered an unethical personal decision. But rather than that, he chose to tell the CEO what was wrong, even though he risked losing his job. So according to this case it was easy to not tell the CEO about a problem in the organization and make more money, however, professionally it is not right to be selfish. A professional must be accountable to the organization at all times. And if he simply didn't speak out about an issue, it could harm many people in the organization or even negatively impact the public. Because in this case the company was going to offer an IPO (Initial Public Offering), maybe after many people buy their shares, there will probably be a risk that the company's value will decrease or be facing bankruptcy. So it's not a question of individuals, it's a question of shareholders and an impact on the public. Third, personal ethics are gathered from your family, friends and can also be developed through life-changing experiences. However, professional ethics are defined once you are part of organizations. Even though your work ethics could be set by someone who tries to make your ethics what they want in order to use it to their advantage. For example, in the case of Enron, many graduate students from top universities worked there. But all of them were in a framework (context) that makes them ethically blind. It's obvious that they were all good workers, even if they didn't realize what was really going on. Therefore, it is easier to change your work ethics to your superiors, especially when you are under time or situational pressure. Even if.