This was Churchill's first delivery to Parliament as Chief Administrator. Hitler had attacked France a few days earlier and Chamberlain, who had been seen to need a non-animosity approach towards Germany, had been forced to leave. Churchill was a traditionalist like Chamberlain, but he had long argued that Germany should be fought all the more effectively. He had not been chosen but appointed chief administrator by the lord, on the recommendation of Chamberlain. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay. Churchill being new to the office, cannot count on the group of spectators who trust him from the beginning, but should gain their certainty through his speech. As the message it must convey is that the war against Germany must be intensified, its essential objective must be to create a feeling of solidarity within the nation, because internal tensions could prove deadly in case of war. He must also imbue himself with the idea that the war can be won and, in this sense, acquire the ability to transform a feeling of misery that develops because of the war into a feeling of expectation, in order to bring people to help him. Churchill argues that England must join us in order to win the war against Hitler. Churchill overcomes early challenges in the speech by reminding the gathering that the leader gave him the task of creating another organization, without investigation. on his power. He goes on to clarify that in carrying out this mission, he is following the request of the Queen, as well as the apparent will of Parliament and the country, as he says. Insisting on this point is a method of limiting the separation between himself and Parliament, using the ethos, the authority that is the Queen, Parliament and the people. At this point the audience is Parliament as I mentioned several times above, but the speech was broadcast by radio stations across the country. So the audience has expanded and it's about the people of Britain. Churchill mentions several times that he works as much for the people as for the leader. Without a doubt, he continues, we work overall for the Nation. It is a conceptual element that functions as an ideological perfect, which can be used as a center to which every citizen can rally, regardless of their political declaration of faith or economic well-being. This shows the use of pathos that Churchill uses to achieve his goal. He ends the introduction by expressing that he has now completed the most imperative part of this mission. The gathering of people is consoled, thanks to this use of pathos, which shows that Churchill is a man who deserves their trust: he presents himself as someone who gets things done, reliably, with more remarkable benefit to the country at the top of its list of priorities thus building its philosophy. Introducing his speech in this manner aims to construct Churchill's philosophy as that of an educated, reliable and competent man. The ability of this part of speech is to set the stage for its suggestion or acceptance. Churchill basically reports the certainties of the case, but in the meantime he figures out how to frighten us with his own part in these matters, "I" have done various things. He also makes a point of being interested in the despair of the circumstance, “vital”, “in a single day”, “yesterday”, “tomorrow”. Going against this enthusiasm, Churchill repeatedly emphasizes that he puts people in general first by saying that [there isthought in the intrigue of the general population] to convene this gathering. He runs into a mistake, which is a scare tactic at first, by using these specific words, and then he hits the audience emotionally by showing them how special they are and that they will be treated special by him and the government in these difficult days. This specific account is thus made from an actual demonstration of what Churchill has done so far, he basically fights by methods for the interest of using logos. Having thus consoled the crowd, that measures are taken to guarantee another stable government "as soon as possible". Under normal conditions, it would take a lot of influence for individuals to “welcome” an approach to war, as for example has happened in countries like Italy. In this argument, Churchill strives to create the balanced assertions necessary for such a strategy, choosing instead to depend on the audience group's sense of the gravity of the circumstances. Rather than presenting us with an argument for the proposed approach, Churchill argues that officially continuing activity (in Norway, Holland, the Mediterranean) makes the requirement for thoughtful controversy unnecessary. In principle, there is no way to be harmed by this argument, hence to disagree with it. As he says, there is a short time to speak: activity speaks louder than words. This activity, he affirms, is not simple. Instead of trying to appease the group of spectators by revealing to them that everything will finally be okay, Churchill emphasizes the great seriousness of the situation through expressions such as "blood, toil, tears and sweat", "a most extreme ordeal. terrible,” and many, many, long periods of battle and endurance. So we can see here one of the many errors Churchill relies on. This one is probably inherently a scare tactic, as it creates horror in the people who hear it, especially after he declares that they are at war. " Churchill's vision of a not-so-distant future is so obvious that we are inclined to believe that he would have recommended a contrasting option to him, if there had been one. This argument he uses because of his emotional words occupies a very high place in the pathetic list of arguments he uses (I mean of all having understood that there is no option different from war (not only according to them). words of Churchill, it is imperative to remember the historical circumstances recorded in this capacity), the group of spectators will probably recognize the answers of the speaker to the questions posed in the last passage. At this point, we could say that Churchill. became a mistake of choice (victory or death, declaring war and not declaring), but judging by the circumstances, especially at the time when Germany had already declared war against France, he had not really no other choice In the final passages he develops both sections of the proposition and creates a great emotional appeal to the audience, taking up arms against Germany and achieving victory (pathos). At this point, passage 12 helps the gathering of people remember the argument for this proposed line of activity, that there is no other option, that there cannot be, as Churchill said, “no survival” without it (as we have already seen). So at this point he uses pathos to further convince people to accept the fact that they are going to war and they have to fight for their own survival. This could also be granted or interpreted as a scare tactic. In closing, Churchill focuses on the fact that he feels.