Callaghan et al. 2018). He was also found to have overdosed a patient with medication instead of administering the amount prescribed by doctors. He did not know what emergency measures should be taken for a patient in cardiac arrest. As a result of his action, the NSW authority faced legal problems and his organization's reputation was damaged. After a thorough investigation, it was discovered that Mr. Ramírez suffered from a mental illness, namely paranoid personality disorder, and that for this reason his mental capacities were reduced. Eventually his registration was canceled and he was currently undergoing treatment. The organization where Mr. Ramirez worked is an organization renowned for providing the best treatment to the patient. They ensure that each patient receives appropriate and effective treatment so that they can recover quickly. However, Mr. Ramírez's case contradicts the organization's goals. The investigation report states that once a patient was admitted to this organization with a cardiac arrest, doctors promptly conducted various tests and administered the required medicine to that patient as the primary treatment. Later, the doctor assigned responsibility for this patient to Mr. Ramírez and asked him to monitor him properly and report his health condition to the doctor regularly. The doctor asked Mr. Ramírez to put the patient on cardiac monitoring. However, instead of following the doctor's instructions, Mr. Ramirez removed the patient from the heart monitor. For this reason, Mr. Ramírez did not report the patient's health condition to the doctor, which delayed the provision of necessary medications and other clinical facilities to the patient. As a result, the patient took a long time to recover. There are many other cases related to Mr. Ramírez that warrant the court's action to cancel his registration. In one case, Mr. Ramirez was asked to administer 1.25 mg of Ramipril to a patient. Instead of following the instructions provided to him, he administered 12.5 mg of Ramipril to this patient. As a result, the patient suffered from a serious health problem. This shows that Mr. Ramirez has a communication problem and is unable to cooperate with other people working within the organization. In another case, Mr. Ramirez had administered the drug Parvolex to a patient who had already taken the drug once, therefore following taking the drug. on two occasions, the patient had to suffer the consequences. The medicine Parvolex is usually given to the patient to treat an overdose of paracetamol. An overdose of paracetamol negatively affects a person's liver, and to combat this, the drug Parvolex is administered. This patient to whom Mr. Ramírez had administered parvolex twice suffered from liver problems. This shows that Mr. Ramirez was very careless during his duty hours and paid less attention to the patients under his care (Campbell, Coyer, and Osborne, 2016). In another case, Mr. Ramirez failed to continue administering IV heparin to a patient. and failed to secure a proper medical examination. This shows that Mr. Ramirez does not have enough skill, knowledge and patience to care for a patient. As a result, the patient suffered from an acute blood clotting problem. Anticoagulant medications like heparin are given to patients who have had surgery or to prevent blood clots from forming in blood vessels. Mr. Ramirez was later found to be mentally unstable and suffering from paranoid personality disorder. People with paranoid personality disorder develop afeeling of distrust and suspicion towards others. This type of person generally does not trust others and does things that seem justified according to this person. The same thing happened in the case of Mr. Ramírez, where he believed that the instructions given to him by doctors or by his superiors were wrong. In response to this, he performed a task that suited him, which resulted in adverse health problems for the patient. The patient's family also claimed that Mr. Ramirez failed to provide the medicines to the patients on time and such delay in health care services was affecting the patient's condition. People who suffer from a paranoid personality problem appear to be very stubborn, hostile and argumentative; like Mr. Ramírez. He was reluctant to follow the instructions given to him and continually argued with his superior regarding his decision. He also lacked adequate communication skills and, for this reason, he was unable to establish healthy connections with either the patient or his colleagues. He also lacks quick thinking when faced with an urgent situation. This causes delays in providing healthcare services to patients who urgently need them. The negligence was not only on the part of Mr. Ramírez, but also on the part of the authorities. Authorities should also ask themselves how they can hire such an imperfect candidate to provide health care to patients. Before hiring, the company did not check Mr. Ramírez's mental and physical condition, but only checked whether or not he had valid registration. This may be due to two reasons: the first is that during the registration period, authorities did not examine Mr. Ramirez's potential, skills, and knowledge (Bennett and Johnson, 2017). The second could be that the health care organization needed more nurses during this time and therefore conducted its recruitment process in haste and did not properly verify Mr. Ramírez's qualifications. According to Runciman, Merry, and Walton (2017), every healthcare unit must maintain safety and ethics within its organization and only then can it provide effective and appropriate service to those who are looking for him. This organization failed to ensure patient safety because of Mr. Ramirez. In the future, to avoid the recurrence of such situations, they must carefully hire employees so that effective healthcare services can be provided to patients. In order to provide proper healthcare, NSW has developed certain policies that must be followed by every nurse. Following these guidelines helped nurses provide appropriate health care services to patients. Mr. Ramirez had little knowledge of the nursing profession and therefore should have applied the techniques provided to him during his training. He should have listened to the instructions given to him by the doctors or nurses of his seniors (Maier and Aiken, 2016). The administration of an excessive amount of Parvolex to the patient and the entire situation could have been avoided if he had listened carefully to the doctor and followed his instructions. As for the case of a patient in cardiac arrest, he should have monitored him more carefully and reported his condition to the doctor. regularly. He should not have removed it from the heart monitor because it would help him monitor the patient's pulse. Under NSW policies, a nurse must monitor the patient regularly and must take prompt action in response to the situation. This helps prevent unwanted health problems of patients. NSW policies also mention that every nurse must developeffective communication with colleagues and with the patient. Ramirez should have been more careful when injecting the medication into the patient and ensured the amount of medication administered. He should have administered the right medicine in the right dose as per the doctor's instructions and in case of doubt, he should have approached the doctor. As for when he administered 12.5 mg of Ramipril instead of 1.25 mg, the patient must have subsequently suffered serious health problems. This situation could have easily been avoided if Mr. Ramirez had been more careful in his task and had exercised his 5 rights regarding medication. In this way, the cancellation of his registration could have been avoided.Keep in mind: This is just a sample.Get a custom paper from our expert writers now.Get a custom essayAs per the discussion mentioned above, the health unit must be very careful when recruiting employees. The reputation of an organization depends entirely on the employees who work there (Gill et al. 2017). As for the organization where Mr. Ramírez worked, it hired him without knowing that he suffered from a mental disability. Mr. Ramírez's activities increased the patient's health problems because he did not possess the skills and knowledge required for the nursing profession. There were numerous cases where Mr. Ramírez administered the wrong medication to a patient or administered an overdose of medication. He was unable to act quickly in an emergency, delaying the provision of health care services to the patient. Later, for these reasons, the court had canceled his registration. From this case study it can be said that nurses must have enough skills and knowledge to take care of the patient, but at the same time they must develop proper communication with the patient so that they can identify the problem areas of the patient very easily. patient. Reference list Bennett, A. & Johnson, D., 2017, “Comorbidity of personality disorder and clinical syndrome among incarcerated high-risk offenders”, Journal of Forensic Practice, vol.19, no.3, pp . 207-216.Buchan, J., Twigg, D., Dussault, G., Duffield, C. and Stone, PW, 2015, “Policies to support nurses: an international perspective”, International Review of Nursing, vol.62, no.2, pp. .162-170.Campbell, JL, Coyer, FM and Osborne, SR, 2016, “Incontinence-associated dermatitis: a cross-sectional prevalence study in the Australian acute hospital setting”, International Wound Journal, vol.13, no. 3, pp.403-411. Cardona-Morrell, M., Prgomet, M., Lake, R., Nicholson, M., Harrison, R., Long, J., Westbrook, J., Braithwaite, J. and Hillman, K., 2016, “Vital signs monitoring and nurse-patient interaction: a qualitative observational study of hospital practice.” » International Journal of Nursing Studies, vol.56, pp.9-16.Cashin, A., Heartfield, M., Bryce, J., Devey, L., Buckley, T., Cox, D., Kerdo, E. , Kelly, J., Thoms, D. and Fisher, M., 2017, “Standards of practice for registered nurses in Australia”, Collegian, vol.24, no.3, pp.255-266. Celaire, S., Mcdermott, MR, 2015, “Comparison of the psychological effects of different psychiatric labels: borderline, paranoid and antisocial personality disorder; Major depression; Anxiety disorder; and post-traumatic stress disorder”, Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry, vol.17, no.1, pp. 33-44. Chiarella, M., Nagy, M., Satchell, CS, Walton, M., Carney, T., Bennett, B., Pierce, SM and Kelly, PJ, 2018, “National registration of health practitioners: a comparative study of the complaints and reporting system under the national system and in New South Wales – Decision makers who deal with complaints/notifications regarding. 567-576.

Essay / Callaghan et al. 2018). He was also found to have overdosed a patient with medication instead of administering the amount prescribed by doctors. He did not know what emergency measures should be taken for a patient in cardiac arrest. As a result of his action, the NSW authority faced legal problems and his organization's reputation was damaged. After a thorough investigation, it was discovered that Mr. Ramírez suffered from a mental illness, namely paranoid personality disorder, and that for this reason his mental capacities were reduced. Eventually his registration was canceled and he was currently undergoing treatment. The organization where Mr. Ramirez worked is an organization renowned for providing the best treatment to the patient. They ensure that each patient receives appropriate and effective treatment so that they can recover quickly. However, Mr. Ramírez's case contradicts the organization's goals. The investigation report states that once a patient was admitted to this organization with a cardiac arrest, doctors promptly conducted various tests and administered the required medicine to that patient as the primary treatment. Later, the doctor assigned responsibility for this patient to Mr. Ramírez and asked him to monitor him properly and report his health condition to the doctor regularly. The doctor asked Mr. Ramírez to put the patient on cardiac monitoring. However, instead of following the doctor's instructions, Mr. Ramirez removed the patient from the heart monitor. For this reason, Mr. Ramírez did not report the patient's health condition to the doctor, which delayed the provision of necessary medications and other clinical facilities to the patient. As a result, the patient took a long time to recover. There are many other cases related to Mr. Ramírez that warrant the court's action to cancel his registration. In one case, Mr. Ramirez was asked to administer 1.25 mg of Ramipril to a patient. Instead of following the instructions provided to him, he administered 12.5 mg of Ramipril to this patient. As a result, the patient suffered from a serious health problem. This shows that Mr. Ramirez has a communication problem and is unable to cooperate with other people working within the organization. In another case, Mr. Ramirez had administered the drug Parvolex to a patient who had already taken the drug once, therefore following taking the drug. on two occasions, the patient had to suffer the consequences. The medicine Parvolex is usually given to the patient to treat an overdose of paracetamol. An overdose of paracetamol negatively affects a person's liver, and to combat this, the drug Parvolex is administered. This patient to whom Mr. Ramírez had administered parvolex twice suffered from liver problems. This shows that Mr. Ramirez was very careless during his duty hours and paid less attention to the patients under his care (Campbell, Coyer, and Osborne, 2016). In another case, Mr. Ramirez failed to continue administering IV heparin to a patient. and failed to secure a proper medical examination. This shows that Mr. Ramirez does not have enough skill, knowledge and patience to care for a patient. As a result, the patient suffered from an acute blood clotting problem. Anticoagulant medications like heparin are given to patients who have had surgery or to prevent blood clots from forming in blood vessels. Mr. Ramirez was later found to be mentally unstable and suffering from paranoid personality disorder. People with paranoid personality disorder develop afeeling of distrust and suspicion towards others. This type of person generally does not trust others and does things that seem justified according to this person. The same thing happened in the case of Mr. Ramírez, where he believed that the instructions given to him by doctors or by his superiors were wrong. In response to this, he performed a task that suited him, which resulted in adverse health problems for the patient. The patient's family also claimed that Mr. Ramirez failed to provide the medicines to the patients on time and such delay in health care services was affecting the patient's condition. People who suffer from a paranoid personality problem appear to be very stubborn, hostile and argumentative; like Mr. Ramírez. He was reluctant to follow the instructions given to him and continually argued with his superior regarding his decision. He also lacked adequate communication skills and, for this reason, he was unable to establish healthy connections with either the patient or his colleagues. He also lacks quick thinking when faced with an urgent situation. This causes delays in providing healthcare services to patients who urgently need them. The negligence was not only on the part of Mr. Ramírez, but also on the part of the authorities. Authorities should also ask themselves how they can hire such an imperfect candidate to provide health care to patients. Before hiring, the company did not check Mr. Ramírez's mental and physical condition, but only checked whether or not he had valid registration. This may be due to two reasons: the first is that during the registration period, authorities did not examine Mr. Ramirez's potential, skills, and knowledge (Bennett and Johnson, 2017). The second could be that the health care organization needed more nurses during this time and therefore conducted its recruitment process in haste and did not properly verify Mr. Ramírez's qualifications. According to Runciman, Merry, and Walton (2017), every healthcare unit must maintain safety and ethics within its organization and only then can it provide effective and appropriate service to those who are looking for him. This organization failed to ensure patient safety because of Mr. Ramirez. In the future, to avoid the recurrence of such situations, they must carefully hire employees so that effective healthcare services can be provided to patients. In order to provide proper healthcare, NSW has developed certain policies that must be followed by every nurse. Following these guidelines helped nurses provide appropriate health care services to patients. Mr. Ramirez had little knowledge of the nursing profession and therefore should have applied the techniques provided to him during his training. He should have listened to the instructions given to him by the doctors or nurses of his seniors (Maier and Aiken, 2016). The administration of an excessive amount of Parvolex to the patient and the entire situation could have been avoided if he had listened carefully to the doctor and followed his instructions. As for the case of a patient in cardiac arrest, he should have monitored him more carefully and reported his condition to the doctor. regularly. He should not have removed it from the heart monitor because it would help him monitor the patient's pulse. Under NSW policies, a nurse must monitor the patient regularly and must take prompt action in response to the situation. This helps prevent unwanted health problems of patients. NSW policies also mention that every nurse must developeffective communication with colleagues and with the patient. Ramirez should have been more careful when injecting the medication into the patient and ensured the amount of medication administered. He should have administered the right medicine in the right dose as per the doctor's instructions and in case of doubt, he should have approached the doctor. As for when he administered 12.5 mg of Ramipril instead of 1.25 mg, the patient must have subsequently suffered serious health problems. This situation could have easily been avoided if Mr. Ramirez had been more careful in his task and had exercised his 5 rights regarding medication. In this way, the cancellation of his registration could have been avoided.Keep in mind: This is just a sample.Get a custom paper from our expert writers now.Get a custom essayAs per the discussion mentioned above, the health unit must be very careful when recruiting employees. The reputation of an organization depends entirely on the employees who work there (Gill et al. 2017). As for the organization where Mr. Ramírez worked, it hired him without knowing that he suffered from a mental disability. Mr. Ramírez's activities increased the patient's health problems because he did not possess the skills and knowledge required for the nursing profession. There were numerous cases where Mr. Ramírez administered the wrong medication to a patient or administered an overdose of medication. He was unable to act quickly in an emergency, delaying the provision of health care services to the patient. Later, for these reasons, the court had canceled his registration. From this case study it can be said that nurses must have enough skills and knowledge to take care of the patient, but at the same time they must develop proper communication with the patient so that they can identify the problem areas of the patient very easily. patient. Reference list Bennett, A. & Johnson, D., 2017, “Comorbidity of personality disorder and clinical syndrome among incarcerated high-risk offenders”, Journal of Forensic Practice, vol.19, no.3, pp . 207-216.Buchan, J., Twigg, D., Dussault, G., Duffield, C. and Stone, PW, 2015, “Policies to support nurses: an international perspective”, International Review of Nursing, vol.62, no.2, pp. .162-170.Campbell, JL, Coyer, FM and Osborne, SR, 2016, “Incontinence-associated dermatitis: a cross-sectional prevalence study in the Australian acute hospital setting”, International Wound Journal, vol.13, no. 3, pp.403-411. Cardona-Morrell, M., Prgomet, M., Lake, R., Nicholson, M., Harrison, R., Long, J., Westbrook, J., Braithwaite, J. and Hillman, K., 2016, “Vital signs monitoring and nurse-patient interaction: a qualitative observational study of hospital practice.” » International Journal of Nursing Studies, vol.56, pp.9-16.Cashin, A., Heartfield, M., Bryce, J., Devey, L., Buckley, T., Cox, D., Kerdo, E. , Kelly, J., Thoms, D. and Fisher, M., 2017, “Standards of practice for registered nurses in Australia”, Collegian, vol.24, no.3, pp.255-266. Celaire, S., Mcdermott, MR, 2015, “Comparison of the psychological effects of different psychiatric labels: borderline, paranoid and antisocial personality disorder; Major depression; Anxiety disorder; and post-traumatic stress disorder”, Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry, vol.17, no.1, pp. 33-44. Chiarella, M., Nagy, M., Satchell, CS, Walton, M., Carney, T., Bennett, B., Pierce, SM and Kelly, PJ, 2018, “National registration of health practitioners: a comparative study of the complaints and reporting system under the national system and in New South Wales – Decision makers who deal with complaints/notifications regarding. 567-576.

Navigation

« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next »

Get In Touch