-
Essay / Comparative analysis of Ocean's 11 (1960) and Ocean's Eleven (2001)
The Ocean's 11 (1960) was a classic, but the remake of Ocean's Eleven (2001) was most successful in intriguing a modern audience with plot twists from the original that turned greed into passion. The latter film considered a modern Vegas more complex than that of the 1960s, implying that it was not a replication of the original but a reinvention to best suit an audience of a different era. The makers of the remake recognized that with new times comes new advancements in mentality and technology. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”?Get the original essayOcean's 11 (1960) and Ocean's Eleven (2001) are both top-rated films based on heists of Las Vegas casinos, both with the same skeletal structure, but slight plot differences that make or break them. These changes, although small, are close to the fine line of an action film that has become unimaginative and boring. In the original, a group of men are motivated solely by greed, while in the remake, Danny Ocean wants revenge on the man who stole his wife, the casino owner. Although both films show a motive through greed, the remake seems to show a deeper side being that there is a struggle for love and marriage. Adding a romantic touch to the film remake was a good way to attract the audience, especially the alpha female who prefers the typical chick flick over the action flick. In the 1960 classic, the group of men consisted of World War II veterans. and unlike that, the follow-up version was made up of rather highly skilled and specialized individuals who had a history of prior scams and heists. This meant that this particular group of men were experienced thieves, which in turn made this version more exhilarating as viewers could put themselves in the perspective of "real bad guys" while the scenes of the initial heist unfolded. The biggest and most striking difference is that in the remake, the gang gets to keep the money at the end, and none of them die, giving the film a much more positive and relieving ending. In the original, when band member Bergdorf died of a heart attack, the money was placed in his coffin to be sent back to San Francisco, but when Bergdorf's wife opted for cremation, it was destroyed when he is left in the coffin. Bergdorf's character is by far the most sensitive viewer throughout the film and his death was sad, which also makes the ending of this version extremely sad. Between "The Rat Pack", no one shows much sympathy for Bergdorf's body or interest in putting it to rest. Being more concerned about money, with so much greed, it kind of made me hope that they wouldn't get the money. In the remake, you don't want them to get caught as much. The Vegas of the 60s was not as complex as it is today. The fact that the supporting cast in the remake used different names will be obvious to those who have watched both versions of the film. It occurred to the directors that new names would bring out a fresher perspective for the newest version. I don't know how it worked, but it did, although I could credit other elements of the new version in terms of feeling fresh. The original "Rat Pack" had a very break and run approach during their heist, which seemed easy enough, even considering the security obstacles at hand.the era. The plan seems far too short and simple for a city as big as Las Vegas. For example, safe doors have been shown to simply be left open during a power outage. Now, we all know that doesn't really happen in a facility where you hold millions and millions of dollars. In the most recent film, the heist takes place at the very famous Bellagio hotel-casino. Their method involved breaking into the safe, which is described as almost impossible to do. While the original film showed more of the casino's scope to orchestrate their very simple, highly anticipated and boring heist, the newer film, hence fresher perspectives, had the tech genius hacking into the security systems and monitoring all cameras, a completely new character whose job was to sit in the vault while he was taken to the vault, and a casino dealer who was added to the group as an asset for the private casino information and a guy who faked a heart attack to stage a distraction. The complexity of their scheme makes the film exhilarating because there are so many things that could go wrong and they almost do. Giving viewers that kind of excitement and anticipation is the key to a successful action movie. Ocean's 11 (1960) is poorly paced and constantly drags because it obviously spent too much time focusing on the less interesting parts of the overall story. Instead of focusing on the heist and making it more complex, he submitted many unnecessary scenes. For example, there is a scene where one of the men met his son and promised to take him to a soccer game. There was literally no meaning in this scene because we never saw the son again and the ball game was never brought up afterward. Many times in the original Frank Sinatra looked bored while playing. Some scenes seemed to have been invented along the way. There was also an extended sequence after the heist that basically consisted of Romero making phone calls before revealing himself who committed the robbery. The time spent showing Romero sitting on the phone seemed like a way to fill the film's time. Unnecessary scenes, or even those that might have been meaningful if they had been short and sweet, took up too much time that should have been spent on the main focus of the heist map, and thus left viewers feeling to be the gang's method. flying was too generalized and unrealistic. The director wasn't very broad-minded or was just lazy. One of the most popular compliments from viewers regarding Ocean's Eleven (2001) is that the film was very well paced and was easily engaging. This version was much more streamlined. The heist was presented in depth and detail. Every little complication that could exist during the heist was discussed and overcome. As previously mentioned from the beginning of the film, the motive was Ocean's intention to take revenge on the man who stole his wife. That alone dramatizes things and makes this heist even more interesting because everyone else in the gang is in it for the greed of money, but the mastermind behind it all is fighting for his wife and that calls for a whole other change. type of passion to succeed in crime. It wouldn't be fair if I completely discredited the 1960 classic when it gave the 2006 the platform to perform. Certainly, both versions of the film had an iconic cast. In Ocean's 11 (1960), the five members of "The Rat Pack" in this film, Frank Sinatra, Dean Martin, Sammy Davis, Jr., Peter.