This may alienate those who are not emotionally involved and are looking for a physical way to reduce shootings and bombings . An optimistic plan to save America's morality by attacking one person at a time is well-intentioned, but it's not the meaty action plan many might want. While not necessarily a complete, complete package that appeals to everyone, May's article resonates well with readers who are prone to pathos and allow themselves to become emotionally invested. This is due to May's strong belief in non-violence, which is probably the very reason this article was written. As a philosopher, May is able to offer what some may consider a one-sided solution to a multidimensional problem. Unfortunately, not everyone is inclined to listen to their emotions or have strong, firmly held ideas.